May 31, 2009

In Battle For Web Traffic, The Left Is Beating The Right

 


imageBy David Kaplan - Wed 27 May 2009

 

The Dems are controlling more than just the White House and Congress.

 

They’re also collectively winning the battle for traffic among political sites. According to the latest comScore (NSDQ: SCOR) numbers, left-leaning sites attracted 6.4 million uniques in April, while the major blogs on the right 4.8 million.

 

The right is not without some bragging rights. Individually, the right had one more site in comScore’s top 20 political blog sites than their left wing counterparts (nine to eight), and many of the conservative sites, like MichelleMalkin.com, had enormous growth, while liberal stalwarts like DailyKos and MyDD appeared to be dropping uniques year-over-year.

 

However, since these are comScore numbers, websites are sure to disagree with the findings. TalkingPointsMemo, for example, tells me the 203,000 uniques that comScore assigned to them is way off; they claim to have had 1.4 million in April.

 

There was one main reason the liberal sites collectively came out ahead: Huffington Post’s dominant 5.6 million uniques, which dwarfs the number-two site Drudge Report’s 1.7 million monthly visitors.

 

That’s a gap that conservative reporter and TV pundit Tucker Carlson is angling to fill with his new political news site The Daily Caller, which The Hill described as a right-wing version of HuffPo.

 

For his part, Carlson told a conference that he plans to position it as a “general-interest newspaper-format style site” that will focus on the Obama Administration. I spoke briefly to Carlson today about the project, which he said is scheduled to launch in three weeks.

 

He declined to offer any further details on whether the site would be ad supported or where the investment money was coming from.

 

Photo Credit: The Situationist

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-in-political-site-traffic-wars-libs-win-tucker-carlson-readies-right-st/

 

Posted via web from Global Business News

Bing's Meaning: But It's Not Google


by Michael Arrington on May 28, 2009

 

Everyone knew today was the day that Microsoft was going to launch their new search engine. Everyone’s been talking about it for months, and the press and marketing efforts were carefully tailored to maximize the impact. Thursday, May 28, 2009 was supposed to be Microsoft Bing Day.

 

A little after 8 am this morning Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer  himself took the stage at the exclusive All Things Digital conference near San Diego, California and announced to a few hundred elite executives that Microsoft would soon be releasing its new search engine, and that it would be called Bing .

 

One problem right off the bat: the Bing.com site wasn’t live. And since press didn’t know the name until Ballmer said it, it took a while for the news to spread.

 

Another problem: A team of Google engineers based in Sydney was simultaneously announcing a stealth project 4+ years in the making called Wave. And it wasn’t being announced to a select few top business executives. Instead, the team that created it was showing it to 4,000 developers at the Google IO conference in San Francisco, California.

 

You know that scene in the Lord Of The Rings movie where the huge eye of Sauron on top of that mountain swings its view from the alliance troops massed at the Black Gate of Mordor over to the real action, Frodo with the Ring at the Cracks of Doom?


That’s basically what happened today. The eyes of the world, and the press , swung from San Diego to San Francisco as they realized what was happening. And what was happening was this: Google stole Microsoft’s thunder with one of the most ambitious and exciting products the tech world has seen in a long while.

 

At the end of the Google Wave presentation, 4,000 developers stood up and cheered like nothing we’ve seen outside of a Steve Jobs keynote. That picture above isn’t the crowd of gray haired execs cheering Bing. It’s a mass of engineers going wild over a new open source communications platform from Google. And yes, that guy on the right was literally waving his laptop in the air in excitement.

 

The fact that everyone in attendance was still glowing from a free Android G2 phone that was handed out the day before didn’t hurt, either.

 

So what happened? Well, the company that will do no evil will certainly engage in a little stealth black ops mission when its required. Google knew full well exactly when Bing was going to launch. And they carefully planned the Wave launch to occur just minutes afterwards. They knew the crowd was ready for something cool. Not only did they have that free phone, but the day before Google VP Engineering Vic Gundotra told the crowd that there would be a big announcement the next day.

 

People were ready and willing to be wowed.

 

And while Wave certainly deserves every bit of positive attention it got today, the fact that it’s an open source project didn’t hurt, either. San Francisco engineers love open source like east coast liberals love Obama.

 

Microsoft never stood a chance. As far as the San Francisco developer crowd is concerned, Bing stands for “But It’s Not Google.”

 

Source: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/28/what-just-happened-thursday-was-supposed-to-be-bing-day/

Posted via web from Pulse Poll

Searching for the Meaning of Bing


bing_c_cmyk

POSTED BY LEVI SUMAGAYSAY ON MAY 28TH, 2009

 

Microsoft’s new/revamped search engine, Bing, will be released June 3.  It promises to deliver more than the customary list of results when called upon to do a search; it is “more of a decision engine,” according to Microsoft SVP Yusuf Mehdi.

 

There will be inevitable exploration of the meaning of the moniker. (Bing has a certain ring to it. It’s much better, of course, than the boring “Live Search.”) Plus there is the bigger question of whether Bing will make a dent in Google’s dominance. But search for clues to another issue Bing brings up: Will it end the Microsoft-Yahoo search flirtation?

 

By some accounts, Bing seems like it would be more useful than a Google or Yahoo search. If you’re searching for something you’d like to buy, for example, Bing theoretically will serve up reviews, as well as places to buy the item and related accessories, laid out in a prettier and more organized way than just a simple vertical list of links.

 

Search for a movie star, and Bing shows you ways to refine your search by movie, images, or quotes, among other things. Below that, you get a list of related searches, such as searches for who that actor might be dating. Bing supposedly will add more features as it continues to try to provide more context with each search.

 

A possible positive for Microsoft: The depth of the searches seems to offer more opportunities for ad revenue. CEO Steve Ballmer has stressed the importance of search and advertising — Google’s bread and butter — in the past.

 

Of course, some people think simple is best, which is part of why Google’s so successful. Early impressions suggest Bing will lure some people who want to achieve a specific goal when doing a search, but that users’ trust in Google to bring them the most relevant results in the most basic of manners won’t wane. The trick will be to get people to think of Bing, too, when they think they might want an enhanced search. Microsoft will be spending a lot of money on the Bing branding campaign, CEO Steve Ballmer said today.

 

So this brings us to what this means for the long-running Microsoft-Yahoo partnership possibility. Is it still going to happen? After all, would Microsoft invest so heavily in Bing if it really thought a deal with Yahoo was imminent?

 

Also, some think that Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz’s statement yesterday that the Sunnyvale company would consider selling search for “boatloads of money”really meant that she doesn’t want to sell. (See Gems from D7: On Yahoo, on the iPhone.) As for Microsoft, it will probably be concentrating its search efforts on rolling out Bing and making it sing.

 

Source: http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2009/05/searching-for-the-meaning-of-bing.html

Posted via web from Global Business News

Went Walkabout. Brought Back Google Wave.


sound_wave

5/28/2009 09:15:00 AM

Back in early 2004, Google took an interest in a tiny mapping startup called Where 2 Tech, founded by my brother Jens and me. We were excited to join Google and help create what would become Google Maps. But we also started thinking about what might come next for us after maps.


As always, Jens came up with the answer: communication. He pointed out that two of the most spectacular successes in digital communication, email and instant messaging, were originally designed in the '60s to imitate analog formats — email mimicked snail mail, and IM mimicked phone calls. Since then, so many different forms of communication had been invented — blogs, wikis, collaborative documents, etc. — and computers and networks had dramatically improved. So Jens proposed a new communications model that presumed all these advances as a starting point, and I was immediately sold. (Jens insists it took him hours to convince me, but I like my version better.)


We had a blast the next couple years turning Where 2's prototype mapping site into Google Maps. But finally we decided it was time to leave the Maps team and turn Jens' new idea into a project, which we codenamed "Walkabout." We started with a set of tough questions:

 

Why do we have to live with divides between different types of communication — email versus chat, or conversations versus documents?

 

Could a single communications model span all or most of the systems in use on the web today, in one smooth continuum? How simple could we make it?

 

What if we tried designing a communications system that took advantage of computers' current abilities, rather than imitating non-electronic forms? 

 

After months holed up in a conference room in the Sydney office, our five-person "startup" team emerged with a prototype. And now, after more than two years of expanding our ideas, our team, and technology, we're very eager to return and see what the world might think. Today we're giving developers an early preview of Google Wave.

A "wave" is equal parts conversation and document, where people can communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps, and more.

 

Here's how it works: In Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets, and even feeds from other sources on the web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly. It's concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave. That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication. You can also use "playback" to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.

As with AndroidGoogle Chrome, and many other Google efforts, we plan to make the code open source as a way to encourage the developer community to get involved. Google Wave is very open and extensible, and we're inviting developers to add all kinds of cool stuff before our public launch. Google Wave has three layers: the product, the platform, and the protocol:

 

The Google Wave product (available as a developer preview) is the web application people will use to access and edit waves. It's an HTML 5 app, built on Google Web Toolkit. It includes a rich text editor and other functions like desktop drag-and-drop (which, for example, lets you drag a set of photos right into a wave). 

 

Google Wave can also be considered a platform with a rich set of open APIs that allow developers to embed waves in other web services, and to build new extensions that work inside waves.

 

The Google Wave protocol is the underlying format for storing and the means of sharing waves, and includes the "live" concurrency control, which allows edits to be reflected instantly across users and services. The protocol is designed for open federation, such that anyone's Wave services can interoperate with each other and with the Google Wave service. To encourage adoption of the protocol, we intend to open source the code behind Google Wave. 

 

So, this leaves one big question we need your help answering: What else can we do with this?

If you're a developer and you'd like to roll up your sleeves and start working on Google Wave with us, you can read more on the Google Wave Developer blog about the Google Wave APIs, and check out the Google Code blog to learn more about the Google Wave Federation Protocol

If you'd like to be notified when we launch Google Wave as a public product, you can sign up at http://wave.google.com/. We don't have a specific timeframe for public release, but we're planning to continue working on Google Wave for a number of months more as a developer preview. We're excited to see what feedback we get from our early tinkerers, and we'll undoubtedly make lots of changes to the Google Wave product, platform, and protocol as we go.

We look forward to seeing what you come up with!

Posted by Lars Rasmussen, Software Engineering Manager

 

Source: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/went-walkabout-brought-back-google-wave.html

Posted via web from Global Business News

GigaOM To Charge For Annual Subscription Service

GigaOM

By David Kaplan - Thu 28 May 2009

 

Tech news blog network GigaOm has unveiled a $79 subscription service, that will offer exclusive research and analysis, the blog’s founder Om Malik (pictured, right) said in a post. The service, dubbed GigaOM Pro, is debuting with 17 research pieces that are available for download as PDFs. GigaOM Pro is divided into four verticals around Green IT, Infrastructure, the Connected Consumer, and Mobile.

 

The plan for a paid subscription service took shape three years ago, Om wrote, the company was embarking on a funding round. Even in 2006, when online advertising was growing at substantial double digits, Om said he realized that ad-support alone wouldn’t cut it. Since then, it has expanded into the conference business and several events. The service is using WordPress’ BuddyPress social platform to run the content.

 

ReadWriteWeb: In an interview, Om told RWW’s Richard MacManus that GigaOM Pro’s Analyst Network will operate in tandem with the blog’s content. As the analysts provide the data, the blog will pick up from there and “connect the dots.” It also represents Om’s view that, as media companies evolve, analysts and bloggers will need to develop a closer link, if readers are to be expected to pay for content.

 

Photo Credit: Flickr/jyri

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-gigaom-to-charge-for-annual-subscription-service/

Posted via web from Global Business News

Wikipedia Blocks Scientology From Altering Entries

Wikipedia

By Glenn Chapman - Fri May 29, 2009

 

SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) - Wikipedia has blocked the Church of Scientology from editing entries at the communally-crafted online encyclopedia due to an unrelenting battle over the group's image.

 

A "longstanding struggle" between admirers of Scientology and critics of the group prompted Wikipedia on Thursday to bar online edits from computer addresses "owned or operated by the Church of Scientology and its associates."

 

An array of editors believed to have taken sides in a Scientology public-image war at Wikipedia have also been barred from tinkering with topics related to the church.

 

"Each side wishes the articles within this topic to reflect their point of view and have resorted to battlefield editing tactics," senior Wikipedia editors said in arbitration committee findings backing the decision.

 

"The worst casualties have been biographies of living people, where attempts have been repeatedly made to slant the article either towards or against the subject, depending on the point of view of the contributing editor."

 

A church spokeswoman downplayed the development, saying the Wikipedia arbitration committee is part of a routine process for handling conflicts at the website.

 

"Do Scientologists care what has been posted on Wikipedia? Of course," said Karin Pouw.

 

"Some of it has been very hateful and erroneous. We hope all this will result in more accurate and useful articles on Wikipedia."

 

Source: http://tech.yahoo.com/news/afp/20090529/tc_afp/usitinternetreligionscientologywikipedia_20090529222413

Posted via web from Global Business News

Google Wave Could Transform Net Communications

May 29th, 2009

 

What do you get when you use e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, wikis and other collaboration tools as a starting point for an entirely new communications model?

 

The answer is Google Wave.

 

Google previewed its latest Web-based application at the Google I/O developer’s conference this week. The Google Maps team, lead by Lars and Jens Rasmussen, developed the application to allow people to communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps and other tools.

 

Wave is the Rasmussens’ answer to questions like: Could a single communications model span all or most of the systems in use on the Web today, in one smooth continuum?

 

And what if we tried designing a communications system that took advantage of computers’ current abilities, rather than imitating nonelectronic forms? It took the brothers two years to come up with some answers that take the form of Wave.

 

Catching the Wave

 

In Google Wave you create a wave, which often starts with instant messaging, and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets and even feeds from other sources on the Web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly.

 

“It’s concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave,” said Lars Rasmussen, a software engineering manager at Google.

 

“That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication. You can also use ‘playback’ to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.”

 

Wave is an HTML 5 app, but it can also be considered a platform with a rich set of open APIs that allow developers to embed waves in other Web services, and to build new extensions that work inside waves.

 

Source: http://www.techeroid.com/2009/05/29/google-wave-could-transform-net-communications/

 

Posted via web from Pulse Poll

Five Reasons to Be Terrified of Google Wave

 


wae

BY CHRIS DANNEN

Fri May 29, 2009 

 

Google Wave, announced today at Google's I/O Developer conference in San Francisco, is a hybridized email system that will fundamentally change the way we think about electronic messaging. This is foreboding for at least five reasons.

 

1) Participating in a Wave is a little like an email chain, and a little like instant messaging; you can embed documents, Google Web Elements, photos and other multimedia, and the whole bailywick is presented as one stream of conversation. People can jump in or jump out at any time, and they can track back to see how a conversation got started. 

 

The advantage, Google says, is "rich formatting." But this "formatting" is also a lot like instant message formatting. We all know what that'll mean: short, declarative sentences; loss of all punctuation, greetings, and email signatures (with important info like phone numbers); and conversations that are much longer than they should be. Dislike long billowy emails? You'll despise the bizarre, choppy prolixity of long waves.

 

2) "With live transmission as you type, participants on a wave can have faster conversations, see edits and interact with extensions in real-time." That's what Google says. Am I the only one who writes an email, then revises it for tone and clarity? It's creepy enough that other people know when I'm typing on Gtalk. Now they can see what I'm thinking as I try out sentences?

 

3) Every college student is familiar with the next liability. Email chains--the closest thing to waves at this point--are all fun and games until someone CC's the wrong person, like a parent, relative, boss or overly-sensitive co-worker. "Any participant can reply anywhere in the message, edit the content and add participants at any point in the process," Google says. That'll make keeping track of participants a lot harder. Subtract the aforementioned opportunities to self-edit, and you have a social trainwreck ready and waiting.


Picture 1

 

4) Google Wave, like all fun new toys on the Web these days, has its own API, aspiring to be a platform as well as a tool. It has "robots" that enable live functions like searching, linking and translation, and a wave can be embedded in a site to make things more "collaborative," according to Google.

 

Leaving aside spam for a second--which I realize is no trifle--what is it with platforms? How many of these things can we have before we all join hands across America? Any company with moderately ambitious developers is already trying to handle smartphone apps, Facebook's API, Twitter, widgets, and who knows how many other endeavors. Do we really need to throw another silo of communication on the pile?

 

5) The worst thing about Wave: I'm going to try it anyway. Google's apps are roundly excellent, with the exception of maybe Picasa, which is shamed by Flickr.

 

Why? I'm curious how Wave survived amidst a new, post-recession Google that cuts funding for pie-in-the-sky projects; obviously, Google really believes in Wave, and the search engine giant is rarely wrong about these things.

 

When Wave goes live "later this year," you can be the first to know--and resent--by signing up here

Source: http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/five-reasons-be-terrified-google-wave


 

Posted via web from Global Business News

Facebook’s New Russian Shareholder Planning Its Own IPO

 


image

By Robert Andrews - Thu 28 May 2009

 

Facebook may not be rushing to go public, but Digital Sky Technologies, the Russian investment fund that just paid $200 million for 1.96 percent of the social network, does plan to IPO.

 

CEO, co-founder and former Mail.ru chief Yuri Milner tells Slon.ru (via Yakov): “Our model ... is to exit via IPO ... An IPO’s timing is dependent on the state of world markets and the willingness of Digital Sky Technologies for the event ... I think it will happen within the next three years.” No info on this point, but it’s quite possible DST would float in London rather than Moscow.

 

DST was already a major-league online investor before buying part of Facebook, holding big interests in Russia’s leading portal Mail.ru, its top social nets Odnoklassniki.ru and Vkontakte.ru (a Facebook clone), dating site Mamba, link exchange Sape.ru plus Poland’s Nasza-Klasa.pl. Does its latest buy make a Facebook IPO more or less likely? Consider the case of Mail.ru, whose own likely

 

IPO was called off last year when DST upped its stake to a majority.

 

DST’s own shareholders include Arsenal football club shareholder Alisher Usmanov, Renaissance Partners, Tiger Global and Goldman Sachs, plus partners Miler, London-based Alexander Tamas and ex hedge fund boss Gregory Finger.

 

Usmanov bumped his stake up by another two percent to 32 percent this week. Russia’s internet audience is Europe’s fourth largest, behind Germany, the UK and France, April figures from comScore said Wednesday.

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-facebooks-new-russian-shareholder-planning-its-own-ipo/

 

Posted via web from Global Business News

May 29, 2009

Transparent Public Toilets from Switzerland

Transparent Public Toilets from Switzerland

Transparent Public Toilets from Switzerland

May 27th, 2009

The city of Lausanne, Switzerland is the home of a modern public toilet with transparent walls.

The walls are partly made from liquid crystal glass. If the visitors want some privacy, they can press the “voir” button and the walls will become opaque under electric tension.

Transparent Public Restroom from Switzerland

Transparent Public Toilet from Switzerland

Transparent Toilet Design by Oloom in 2008 [via]

 

Don’t Miss A Sec Toilet

Similar toilet was showcased at Basel art fair in Switzerland, back in 2004:

Dont Miss A Sec Toilet

Don’t Miss A Sec by Monica Bonvicini was an outdoor toilet temporary installed on a crowded street adjacent to the fair.

The one-way glass allowed users to continue seeing art and people while not being seen themselves.

 

Source: http://www.toxel.com/tech/2009/05/27/transparent-public-toilets-from-switzerland/

Posted via web from Pulse Poll

On the Web, Streams Are Replacing Pages

By Joseph Tartakoff - Wed 27 May 2009

 

The Inside Word is a weekly feature that looks at unusual industry debates and discussions unfolding on the blogs of employees at digital-media companies.

 

Poster: John Borthwick

 

Blog name: THINK / Musings

Company: Betaworks

 

Backstory: Borthwick leads New York City-based tech investor Betaworks, whose network includes buzzy startups like Twitter, bit.ly, stocktwits and Tumblr. Borthwick blogs only occasionally but says he was moved to post this month when he noticed that companies in Betaworks portfolio were getting an increasing amount of traffic “via social distribution” networks.

 

Blog Entry: Perhaps it’s not surprising that Borthwick, given the heavy social-media component in the Betaworks portfolio, is an advocate of the “stream,” epitomized by the Facebook newsfeed and by Twitter. But in his blog post, he goes so far as to say that the stream has replaced the “page” as the metaphor for the web: “For 15 years, the primary metaphor of the web has been pages and reading,” Borthwick writes.

 

“The metaphors we used to circumscribe this possibility set were mostly drawn from books and architecture (pages, browser, sites, etc.). Most of these metaphors were static and one way. The stream metaphor is fundamentally different. [It’s] dynamic, it [doesn’t] live very well within a page and [is] still very much evolving.”

 

One implication: Since people are finding information via sites like Twitter or Facebook, website traffic will no longer always be steady, Borthwick argues. In a given month, there will be days when traffic will be way above average and sites should try to take advantage of this: “So what to do when a burst takes place? I have no real idea [what’s] going to emerge here, but cursory thoughts include making sure the author is present to manage comments etc., and build in a dynamic mechanism to alert the crowd to other related items.”

 

Post-script: In a followup exchange, we asked Borthwick what this might mean for advertisers, who are used to buying against a relatively consistent level of traffic. He said tools would emerge so that advertisers could put offers in front of crowds when they suddenly show up on a site. “It’s early days, but if the traffic flow changes, the way ad (dollars) work will shift as well,” he said.

 

Please e-mail suggestions for future editions of the Inside Word to joe@paidcontent.org

 

Photo credit: Mary Hodder

 

Source: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-the-inside-word-the-web-is-not-dry/

Posted via web from Global Business News

Twittergate Over German Poll Results

 


Twitter-bird

By Chris Bryant in Berlin

Published: May 27 2009

 

It is already being dubbed “Twittergate”. The internet communication craze that has swept the world has caused a political furore in Germany, where the country’s parliamentary elders will on Thursday launch a probe into twittering MPs who broke decades of tradition and leaked news of the president’s re-election.

 

The probe, which has already led one MP to resign from a parliamentary post, underscores the rapid spread of 140 character “tweets”, which are growing in popularity at a faster rate than social networking site Facebook.

 

Users of Twitter grew from 1.6m to 32m worldwide over the past year, according to Comscore, the web measurement company.

 

News that Hörst Köhler had been re-elected as German president on Saturday was published on the micro-blogging service almost 15 minutes before the result was officially announced.

 

Julia Klöckner, of chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU, told her Twitter “followers” on that afternoon: “People, you can watch the football in peace. The vote was a success.” She later apologised for the “somewhat premature timing” of a message.

 

Ulrich Kelber, of the SPD, was even more specific, prematurely uploading the result of the vote-count to his micro-blog: “The count is confirmed: 613 votes. Köhler is elected.”

 

The Social Democrats, whose candidate for the presidency failed, were initially incensed by the Twitter leaks. Yet both SPD and CDU have since played down the matter.

 

Although the winner came as no surprise, the breach of protocol has upset seasoned members of parliament. Parliamentary elders, the ultimate guardians of proper legislative conduct, are due to meet over Twittergate today.

 

Critics insist that only the Bundestag president has the constitutional right to declare a new head of state. He customarily uses more than the 140 characters permitted in a tweet. “I have absolutely no sympathy for things like this, because it will end up undermining the dignity of parliament,” said Peter Ramsauer, head of the CSU parliamentary party.

 

Susanne Kastner, vice-president of the house and a Social Democrat, deplored the incident. “But unfortunately, you cannot ban twitting in parliament,” she said. Others noted that boredom might have acted as a mitigating factor for the guilty twitters – because of three recounts, the result of the vote was made public almost an hour after the official schedule.

 

Twitter, and blogging in general, remain relatively niche pastimes in Germany but politicians are no strangers to technology. In addition to publishing a weekly webcast, the chancellor keeps tabs on government members and aides via text message, which she can often be seen writing from her seat in parliament’s plenary hall.

 

Indeed close advisors insist Ms Merkel is no less addicted to instant electronic than US president Barack Obama is to his BlackBerry device.

 

Source: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/04a3fe96-4a93-11de-87c2-00144feabdc0.html

 

Posted via web from Global Business News

World First: Japanese Scientists Create Transgenic Monkeys

World first: Japanese scientists create ...

AFP - Thursday, May 28

PARIS (AFP) - - In a controversial achievement, Japanese scientists announced on Wednesday they had created the world's first transgenic primates, breeding monkeys with a gene that made the animals' skin glow a fluorescent green.

 

The exploit opens up exciting prospects for medical researchers, they said.

It could eventually lead to lab monkeys that replicate some of humanity's most devastating diseases, providing a new model for exploring how these disorders are caused and how they may be cured.

 

"Great advances in pre-clinical research can be expected using these models," the team said. But other voices warned of a potential ethics storm, brewed by fears that technology used on our closest animal relatives could be turned to create genetically-engineered humans.

 

In a study published in the British journal Nature, a team led by Erika Sasaki of the Central Institute for Experimental Animals at Keio University reported on experiments on common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), a small monkey native to Brazil.

 

They introduced a foreign gene, tucked inside a virus, into marmoset embryos that were then nurtured in a bath of sucrose.

 

The gene codes for green fluorescent protein (GFP), a substance that was originally isolated from a jellyfish and is now commonly used as a biotech marker. An animal tagged with GFP glows green when exposed to ultraviolet light, proving that a key gene sequence has been switched on.

 

The transgenic embryos were then implanted in the uterus of seven surrogate mother marmosets.

 

Three of recipients miscarried. The other four gave birth to five offspring, all of which carried the GFP gene.

 

In two of these five, the GFP gene had been incorporated into the reproductive cells. A second generation of marmosets was then derived from one of the two.

 

The work is important, because medical researchers have hankered for an animal model that is closer to the human anatomy than rodents.

 

Mice and rats, genetically engineered to have the symptoms of certain human diseases, are the mainstay of pre-clinical lab work, in which scientists test their theories before trying out any outcome on human volunteers.

 

But many disorders, especially neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, are so complex that they cannot be reproduced meaningfully in rodents because their biology is different.

 

Hopes for a non-human primate model have until now been dashed by the failure to insert a gene into a monkey's sperm and eggs -- the "germline" that ensures that the inserted DNA is passed on to future generations rather than lost.

 

The first genetically-modified monkey was born in 2000. Known as ANDi (the initials of "Inserted DNA," spelt backwards), the rhesus carried the GFP gene but not in its reproductive cells.

 

The latest exploit thus opens up hopes of eventually breeding colonies of transgenic primates with inherited traits that closely replicate human disease.

 

"This is the first case ever established in the world that an introduced gene was successfully inherited (by) the next generation in primates," the researchers said in a press relase.

 

Future plans include creating transgenic marmosets that replicate human diseases such as Parkinson's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

 

In a commentary also published by Nature, Gerald Schatten and Shoukhrat Mitalipov, primate research specialists in the US, praised the achievement as "undoubtedly a milestone" but sounded caution.

 

They said marmosets were not as useful as baboons or rhesus monkeys in replicating some diseases, notably HIV and tuberculosis.

 

Another question was the random insertion of a foreign gene in the monkey's genetic code. This may have caused some of the miscarriages and, if previous research is a guide, could unleash cancer.

 

Scientists also have to address legitimate public concern about animal welfare and the need for "realistic policies" to prevent genetically-engineered babies, they warned.

 

"There are many unanswered questions," Helen Wallace, of GeneWatch UK, a British NGO that monitors the ethics of gene research, told AFP.

 

"It's a big step from making a fluorescent green marmoset to making a marmoset that replicates a human disease, it's a much more complicated thing to do.

 

"There's also a very important ethical debate, firstly about the animals themselves and secondly about what this might lead to in the future, whether it might be ethically justified to genetically engineer humans."

 

Source: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20090528/tts-science-biotech-genes-monkey-c1b2fc3.html

Posted via web from Global Business News

May 28, 2009

Global Newspaper Sales Inched Up in 2008

Global newspaper sales inched up in 2008: ...

AFP - Thursday, May 28

BARCELONA, Spain (AFP) - - Global newspaper sales inched up last year, contradicting gloomy predictions that dailies face extinction, as gains in Africa, Asia and Latin America offset slumps in Europe and the US, an industry group said Wednesday.

 

Newspaper sales grew 1.3 percent worldwide last year from 2007 to 539 million daily, a rise of 8.8 percent over the past four years, said Gavin O'Reilly, president of the World Association of Newspapers.

 

"The sector continues to grow," he said at the start of a two-day WAN conference in Barcelona, adding media commentators were making a "mistake" when they predicted the death of daily newspapers.

 

Dailies in wealthier nations are struggling due to the impact of the Internet and the slump in advertising caused by the economic downturn. Several US newspaper groups have declared bankruptcy in recent months, including the Tribune Co., owner of the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, the Baltimore Sun and several other newspapers.

 

Two major US dailies, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and The Rocky Mountain News, have shut down in the past few months, and dozens of others are threatened. But in other markets like Asia, where a growing middle class is boosting the market for daily newspapers, the print media is thriving.

 

The Indian print media industry recorded growth of 16 percent in 2007 over the previous year, according to a study by PriceWaterhouse Coopers presented at the conference.

 

The relative health of the sector in the region was underscored earlier this month when the Wall Street Journal began printing a regional edition of the business newspaper in India, the world's second-most populous nation.

 

O'Reilly said advertising revenues at dailies around the world fell by about 5.0 percent last year and predicted the drop should be even steeper in 2009 but he said the sector would "rebound" once the global economic downturn ends.

 

He said the sector was facing a period of "hyper change" with the appearance of new platforms for the distribution of information such as the Internet and mobile telephones, but it would find ways to adapt to this new environment.

 

"The future is only online," he said.

 

Two-thirds of respondents in a survey carried out by PriceWaterhouse Coopers in seven countries that was presented Wednesday at the conference said they were willing to pay for general news content online.

 

Analysts predict that the advent of better mobile Internet technology such as the reader-friendly Apple iPhone combined with new payment systems will eventually make it easier for newspapers to flourish in the digital age.

 

The Wall Street Journal has had success in providing both free and paid content, reserving the deeper analysis, opinion and insight for paying readers only. It has just over one million online subscribers.

 

Rupert Murdoch, whose News International owns the Journal, has said he expects his other titles to start charging too for full access. Finnish print media group Sanoma, one of the five largest magazine publishers in Europe with 220 titles and operations in more than 20 countries, has also built up a strong Internet presence which makes a key contribution to its bottom line.

 

"There is no free content," the head of Sanoma's news division, Mikael Pentikainen, told the conference. Sanoma, which publishes the Nordic regions largest broadsheet, Helsingin Sanomat, earns about 1.35 billion euros (1.88 billion dollars) per year from its print newspapers compared to 150 million euros from its online operations.

 

WAN represents 18,000 newspapers from over 120 countries.

 

Source: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20090528/ttc-spain-media-internet-industry-newspa-0de2eff.html

Posted via web from Global Business News

Ballmer on Bing, the Economy, and More

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, on stage at D: All Things Digital with Walt Mossberg, introducing the company's revamped search engine, dubbed Bing.

(Credit: Ina Fried/CNET)

May 28, 2009 8:18 AM PDT

by Ina Fried

 

CARLSBAD, Calif.--Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer kicked off his speech Thursday talking about the economy, though he also plans to show off Microsoft's revamped search engine within minutes.

 

In a speech at D: All Things Digital, Ballmer was asked by moderator Walt Mossberg to discuss the economy and how long the downturn will last. Ballmer said that he didn't expect the economic collapse to be a 50-year-thing, but it won't turn around in three months either. (Thanks for narrowing that down)

 

"People generally agree this is a different recession," Ballmer said. "To think that things would be back in a year seems naive to me." Had the economy not tanked, Ballmer said the company's research and sales and marketing would have continued to improve. "You'll do less new," he said, in today's economy.

 

Update 8:20 a.m. PT: 

 

The talk is turning to search. Ballmer says Microsoft is willing to "upgrade" its talent when necessary. "We're obviously where we are in search, " he said. "We want to do better, no question." 

 

8:22 a.m. PT: 

 

More on search. "It takes persistence," Ballmer siad. "We certainly flailed with Windows before we got it right," Now showing video on the introduction of search. Jokes about their naming plans and failed Yahoo bid. And it's... BING. "We wanted something that unambiguously said search," Ballmer said, explaining why Microsoft decided to rebrand Live Search.

 

8:30 a.m. PT: 

 

Ballmer now talking about why Bing. He said the company wanted something that was short, could be used as a verb and didn't have "negative or unusual" connotations. He put the renaming in context. "This is a very important step," Ballmer said. "It doesn't substitute for innovation." Yusuf Mehdi comes on stage to demo Bing. Ballmer interrupts to position how far Microsoft has come. "There's no way to just change the whole game in one step," he said. "There's a lot of unmet needs in this category."

 

8:35 a.m. PT: 

 

Demo showing some of the key features. For example, search identifies best match, sometimes hiding other results when there is one clear match that someone is looking for. Also includes customer service phone numbers when you search for a company like Amazon.com or Microsoft itself.

 

8:40 a.m. PT: 

 

Now showing the main interface of Bing--it's left hand navigation and breaking down of searches by categories. It's a mix of human and computer categorization, Microsoft said. On the video search site, when you hover over a thumbnail result it starts playing right from the thumbnail.

 

8:45 a.m. PT:

 

On to product search. Mehdi howing how it includes user and professional reviews gathered from a variety of sites. Travel search gets integration with the Farecast site Microsoft bought. Farecast helps predict whether current rates and fares will go up or down.

Mossberg hits on one of the questions I raised about all the integration of content from other sites directly into Bing. "How about all these people that expect to make money off their Web sites," Mossberg asks. "Were not trying to get in the way of copyright holders," Ballmer said. "We're not trying to live off other people's work. We are just trying to make a good product." Ballmer notes some of different ways content gets there. Some is licensed he said, other is what can be crawled "under copyright law." "We license content to be in here," Ballmer said. "That's a way to do it."

 

8:45 a.m. PT: 

 

Mossberg asks Ballmer what makes him think this will do the trick. Ballmer says that phrasing implies things will change overnight, which they won't. "My timeframe is 'lots of years'" Ballmer said. Mossberg noted that Ask had an improved engine at one time that gained share after a relaunch, but the gains faded. "Ask was not consistent," Ballmer said. "They didn't keep pounding and pounding."

 

8:55 a.m. PT: 

 

So how much is Microsoft spending on ads? "We'll have a big budget," Ballmer said. "It was big enough that I had to gulp when I approved it," he said, adding that a gulp in a $60 billion company is a big thing.

 

8:57 a.m. PT: 

 

The talk is shifting to smartphones. Ballmer, not surprisingly, tries to paint the PC as the more important mobile devices. "Most wireless data goes over PCs," he said. "It doesn't go over phones." That said, Ballmer agreed that "smartphones are going to increase like crazy."

He said that 500 million smartphones a year are going to be sold over time. "I want to sell a very significant percentage of all of those through our partners," he said. "That is very important financially to us, strategically to us."

 

8:59 a.m. PT: 

 

The talk turns to Netbooks. Walt Mossberg notes that the research the conference organizers did shows most people don't plan to buy a Netbook even when the economy improves. Ballmer says that has more to do with "fuzziness" around the Netbook brand. He said the figure would be a lot higher if the question asked how many people plan to by a notebook computer.

 

9:01 a.m. PT

 

Windows 7 is "on track" for holiday season. Mossberg asked about enterprise adoption. Would Windows 7 be faster than Vista? "Vista was faster than XP, ironically," Ballmer said. "Windows 7 has the potential to be faster still than Vista (in the enterprise)"

 

9:04 a.m. PT: 

 

On to questions. The first one comes from a venture capitalist that sees the new Office "ribbon" user interface as a productivity drain. Ballmer said that "any time you make any change in the user experience of any thing you are going to have people" that don't like it.

"When they change the (Wall Street) Journal, I always hate it for a while," Ballmer said. "Software has that same characteristic."

 

9:05 a.m. PT: 

 

Next question is on search. User asks whether if he is searching for a "Hilton" in "Paris" he gets the result he wants or, perhaps some other result would come up. (I'll do that search and let you know what happens).

 

9:07 a.m. PT:

 

Esther Dyson asks about Microsoft's healthcare business. Ballmer said that the company is investing in several areas, including business intelligence that can merge together several different electronic health records. That's important, Ballmer said, because it is unlikely that even as records go digital that people will have just one place where all their health data is stored. "You are going to have several records," Ballmer said.

 

9:04 a.m. PT:

 

A question on Netbooks and Windows 7. Ballmer says computer makers will be able to use Windows XP as well as many versions of Windows 7. Have you met with Yahoo recently?

"I think there's a lot that can make sense in terms of a search partnership, not an acquisition," Ballmer said. "Whether such a thing will happen I don't know."

As for a meeting, Ballmer noted that Carol Bartz left a message for Ballmer in a book that the D makeup artist had people sign. "The makeup couldn't fix me if it tried," Bartz wrote, according to Ballmer.

 

9:14 a.m. PT: 

 

Ballmer's done.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10251087-56.html

Posted via web from Global Business News